Let’s Dish: Recipes without pictures is a crime

by Amy Flanigan on March 24, 2009 · 15 comments

There are two food groups – people who eat to live, and people who live to eat. If you fall into the latter, then you probably go to bed dreaming about breakfast, cannot wait to dine at the newest restaurant, and savor every bite of dessert. And if that’s the case then you will probably share in my contention for recipes without pictures.

One of my favorite pastimes (more like a luxury, since I had kids) is going to a bookstore and looking at all the cookbooks. And I am constantly amazed at how many of them do not include pictures. I am certain that it’s a cost issue, but I still think it’s a crime.

I believe we are all visual creatures (yes, women too!) and respond to things that are beautiful. I also believe that great food photography influences what new recipes we might attempt to make, and certainly inspires us to try different ingredients.

I recently stumbled upon rasamalaysia, a cooking blog that incorporates the finest food photography. She is also most generous, divulging some helpful tips on how to achieve such mouth watering images. If this woman can’t convince you to try a brussel sprout, nobody can.

My guess is, she also shares in my grievance that recipes should be accompanied by a gorgeous photo!

rasamalasia3 rasamalasia1 rasamalasia2

Click on the photos for artist information.

PinterestFacebookTwitterStumbleUponGoogle+Share

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

Astrid September 27, 2009 at 5:36 pm

This is one of my most common rants. When I am looking through cook books at a store I will immediately put the book back if it has no pictures. I don’t care how good the recipes are. I am one of those people who hates following recipes. I base my meals off of recipes, so if there is not picture, I don’t get ideas! I am an extremely visual person. What is the fun of making cookies if you don’t have the picture to drool over, first? What is the point of making anything without at least having some image to fantasize over? Thank you for this post, it takes the words right out of my brain!

Reply

Melissa April 3, 2009 at 5:40 pm

Her blog is fantastic, isn’t it? And I agree, pictures are necessary. My flittering brain loses interest otherwise.

Reply

Richard March 25, 2009 at 7:43 pm

For most sites now the photo is as much marketing as it is food art, and Jennifer is right: We all want our dishes to look like the photo. But I also like blogs where people take their own pictures and don’t worry too much about the sexiness of the photo. Their pictures fall into the “for illustrative purposes only” category, and suit me just fine.

Recipes need pictures.

Reply

Jennifer March 25, 2009 at 10:55 am

Totally agree. I won’t make a recipe without a photo. For some reason, I feel like I need to know what the food is “supposed” to look like. It’s always very satisfying to me when my dish comes out looking like the picture; I feel like I’ve really accomplished something, BUT the taste of it is always key!

Reply

Jay March 25, 2009 at 10:46 am

I’m still waiting for the wonderful modern technology catch up and allow us to actually smell the food too?

Reply

Rachel March 25, 2009 at 10:02 am

While I use plenty of recipes without pictures, I definitely have an appreciation for food photography. Thank you so much for that blog; that is definitely going in the bookmarks! Another really good one – Smitten Kitchen. Her photos are a-mazing.

Yay for food porn! The site had the most amazing blackberry muffins I have ever seen. Must. eat. those. now.

Reply

Carol March 25, 2009 at 10:01 am

My oldest cookbooks have few pictures, but anything new I buy does. After reading your posting today, I realized how much I’m influenced by the photos. However, the ingredients and cooking directions still determine if I’ll try a new recipe no matter how beautiful the dish looks.

Reply

Jude March 25, 2009 at 9:13 am

Agreed. I need the visual (porn). A good photograph will grab my attention and make my mouth water for dishes I would never actually eat (pig/cow/bird/rabbit…). Captivating imagery is hard to ignore. Props to the food stylists and photographers!

Reply

Mike March 25, 2009 at 8:08 am

Food photography is an art form unto itself. I’ve been told it’s extremely difficult and a good food photographer is rather rare. So all those beautiful food photos probably cost a bit of dough. They certainly get my taste buds in the mood though. Porn for the palate. Ha!

Reply

Cheryl March 25, 2009 at 7:29 am

Yes yes yes – must have the picture. So sad really, since I know there are plenty of wonderful recipes out there that don’t include pictures. But to get my attention, I need to see what the end product looks like first. Maybe that means I don’t have much of an imagination :(

Reply

Anna March 25, 2009 at 6:16 am

I used to have a problem with this, but I’ve found that a good name and written description is enough to get my attention these days.

Reply

Tara March 25, 2009 at 6:04 am

I totally agree!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

HTML tags are not allowed.

Previous post:

Next post: